Preferences of lung cancer patients for treatment and decision-making

a systematic literature review

verfasst von
K. Schmidt, K. Damm, A. Prenzler, H. Golpon, T. Welte
Abstract

The consideration of patient preferences in decision-making has become more important, especially for life-threatening diseases such as lung cancer. This paper aims to identify the preferences of lung cancer patients with regard to their treatment and involvement in the decision-making process. We conducted a systematic literature review from 12 electronic databases and included studies published between 2000 and 2012. A total of 20 studies were included in this review. These revealed that lung cancer patients do have preferences that should be considered in treatment decisions; however, these preferences are not homogenous. We found that patients often consider life extension to be more important than the health-related quality of life or undesirable side effects. This preference seems to depend on patient age. Nausea and vomiting are the most important side effects to be avoided; the relevance of other side effects differs highly between subgroups. The majority of lung cancer patients, nevertheless, seem to prefer a passive rather than an active role in decision-making, although the self-reported preferences differed partly from the physicians' perceptions. Overall, we identified an urgent need for larger studies that are suitable for subgroup analyses and incorporate multi-attributive measurement techniques.

Organisationseinheit(en)
Center for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH)
Externe Organisation(en)
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH)
Biomedical Research in Endstage & Obstructive Lung Disease (BREATH)
Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung (DZL)
Typ
Übersichtsarbeit
Journal
European Journal of Cancer Care
Band
25
Seiten
580-591
Anzahl der Seiten
12
ISSN
0961-5423
Publikationsdatum
27.06.2016
Publikationsstatus
Veröffentlicht
Peer-reviewed
Ja
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
Onkologie
Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung
SDG 3 – Gute Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
Elektronische Version(en)
https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12425 (Zugang: Geschlossen)